Conspiracy Theory With Jesse Ventura: Global Warming part 2 of 7


Wednesday December 16 2009 Whether global warming іѕ real οr nοt, ѕοmе people mау bе using thе come forth tο earn billions οf dollars, ѕtаrt a one-world government аnd control people’s lives. Jesse’s deep investigation uncovers evidence thаt сουld point tο one man being behind аn entire global-warming conspiracy. Featured Experts аnd Eyewitnesses: Lord Christopher Monckton, British politician, business consultant, policy advisor, writer аnd inventor whο disagrees wіth mainstream scientific consensus οn global warming; Richard Lindzen, atmospheric physicist, professor οf meteorology аt MIT аnd author whο alleges political pressure οn climate scientists; Amit Chaterjee, initiator аnd CEO οf Hara Software, аn environmental startup backed іn раrt bу Al Gore’s venture capital firm; Ben Santer, climate researcher аt Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory; Noel Sheppard, associate editor οf NewsBusters.org аnd outspoken critic οf global-warming science; “Dr. X,” аn eminent climatologist whο wаntѕ tο protect hіѕ identity fοr hіѕ family’s safety; George Hunt, a UN whistleblower аnd author; аnd Martin Durkin, producer аnd director οf thе UK Channel 4 documentary Thе Splendid Global Warming Swindle.

25 Responses to “Conspiracy Theory With Jesse Ventura: Global Warming part 2 of 7”

  • fromthetothemmy:

    wtf the guy whose shrouded in dark… whats the point of “hiding his identity” when in the vid they already claimed he was the leading man in global cooling and dont censor his voice?

  • jonman701:

    @nigelelsass Oh and GROW UP!!
    LIES LIES LIES what are you straight from day care?
    YOU are the ones export the play doh from the company that did a examine on human ecology that claims the human body shows a real lack of play doh and we all need to buy 10lbs a month of the stuff, your being SUCKERED and scientists (real experts) who have no financial gains whatsoever (unlike the twisted facts by the ones that don’t or being paid etc)
    And now your running around listening to all the play doh sellers

  • jonman701:

    @nigelelsass Your just a jackass who calls anyone a liar just because you have to be right, there is no truth in a person like you, you are void of truth, you have no solid facts, you believe the UN likely in everything and would place on a NAZI uniform if they told you to do that to, get your own mind take your head out of your ass and look outside, I KNOW FROM EXPERIENCE AND SO DO SCIENTISTS ALL OVER THE WORLD YOU ASS MUNCH!
    Your a waste of time man, your so lost its sad!! lol

  • jonman701:

    @nigelelsass What? the warmest? ITS A FACT!!! THAT ITS THE COLDEST DECADE!!

    You have no thought about ANYTHING L M A O @ U
    You ARE IN FACT A LIAR OR HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOUR TALKING ABOUT!!

    next thing he will do is deny gravity, i have a splendid thought, before posting against gravity how about you test it by jumping off a tall building to prove me ill-treat lmao

    I don’t lie you cheap ass moron, its called THE FACTS!! you can’t handle the facts then get the hell out of the way, weak minded fool.

  • jonman701:

    @nigelelsass Oh its not a LIE you jackass!!!
    So your telling me all the people who have no financial incentive into global warming who are Nobel prize winners and are VERY respected smart people as well as everyone else who observed throughout history are all liars and your telling the truth?LOL

    I agree with your lie alert, i would just turn it back into your own direction, i believe you have NO IDEA what your talking about lol
    Your so insincere unless your retarded copying and pasting info lol

  • nigelelsass:

    @jonman701

    LIE LIE LIE LIE LIE ALERT

    The Solar hypothesis is a LIE for the following reasons:

    - no increase in day/night temperature difference
    - no uniform warming of all atmospheric layers
    - no recorded increase in solar irradiance
    - no warming strong around the equator (on the contrary…)

    also LIE about temperatures on a 10-y average footing (please anyone reading this check as this is a monumental LIE)

  • nigelelsass:

    @jonman701 :

    Weather…. not climate as TSI has not changed. It does not change much the total energy input on earth and does not influence the 10-years average

    A FEW DEGREES ON THE GLOBAL AVERAGE MAKES A DIFFERENCE

    The Solar hypothesis is a LIE for the following reasons:

    - no increase in day/night temperature difference
    - no uniform warming of all atmospheric layers
    - no recorded increase in solar irradiance
    - no warming strong around the equator (on the contrary…)

  • nigelelsass:

    @jonman701 :

    LIE ALERT – LIE ALERT – LIE ALERT

    So far this decade has been the warmest and each decade so far has been warmer than the previous.

    YOU LIE!!! (I like it as anyone can access datasets from land minutes, satellite minutes etc. making it obvious where the huge obvious lie is… keep it coming – make even larger lies pleaase)

  • jonman701:

    @nigelelsass Hey pollution is not excellent no doubt about it but when its colder outside and people are running around going “oh my gosh global warming” and there are people sitting there waiting to make cash off it, its a scam, because of a so called gradual increase in temperature should really be taking house and not a cooling, in fact there is more of a risk of global cooling then warming AND in fact the temperature of the earth over a 100 years ago was MUCH higher in % then this century.THINK!

  • jonman701:

    @nigelelsass Fact of the matter is your being LIED too!
    The global warming information is being either twisted or made up, you have scientists that have no tie saying its all fake and then you believe the people who have a tie to profits saying its not, its common sense whats going on, i reckon i will take the side of the Nobel prize winners and COMMON SENSE.

  • jonman701:

    @nigelelsass Source the sun PROVEN OVER AND OVER AGAIN!
    This has be observed for the past few hundred years, the earth goes into phases and are you retarded? yes sunspots correlate with higher warming, its been proven that the sun spots correlate with temperature.
    Where do you get your information from? how can you trust it? huh?
    im telling you now temperature in the past 10 years has be DRASTICALLY COOLER! if global warming had any base to it, that wouldn’t be happening PERIOD! common sense!

  • jonman701:

    @nigelelsass There has only been one source that proves anything regarding temperature on the earth and thats the sun!
    Common sense, you have scores of scientists saying that only sunspots really drastically change weather on earth, its really A FACT!!
    A few degrees don’t make a difference the earth fluctuates its NORMAL it would be weird if it didn’t and what mankind does makes modest difference unless its very very local, its the SUN, global warming “experts” have cash in this.. its a scam

  • jonman701:

    @nigelelsass The odds have nothing to do it, how about first off common sense, its a fact the last decade has been been very cold, its a fact, its a fact that the ONLY measurements that show any change in the temperature in the earth is the sun, been documented for a couple hundred years without an agenda, but with Global warming its a scam they make MONEY OFF IT, there is nothing, NOTHING to show any temperature change that’s abnormal, they are LYING!
    Global warming is a giant LIE!!

  • nigelelsass:

    @jonman701 : You can off course deny that all thousands of measurements are ill-treat… this is but really not probable and foliage you one chance in 1000.
    Worldwide over 90% of natural cycles show a warming trend. It would take trees, insects, ocean temperatures, stratospheric temperatures, ice covers, perenial ice go up, etc. to all lie… what are the odds?

  • nigelelsass:

    @jonman701 : And by the way, small term (11-years cycle) Sunspot activity leads to a fluctuation of only +1/-1 W/m2 which is much decrease than the warming from greenhouse gases which is already measured. So in small YES IT IS IRRELEVANT and has been proven NOT to be the cause of the recent warming.

    People who have orchards will tell you that trees blossom 2-3 weeks earlier.

  • nigelelsass:

    @jonman701 : MEASURED: cooling of the stratosphere
    MEASURED: reduced IR radiation to space
    MEASURED: increase in IR radiated back to earth on specific greenhouse gases wavelength
    MEASURED: slightly lowered day-night temperature difference
    MEASURED: warming over the last 30 years with higher warming in polar areas
    MEASURED: sunspot correlated with total solar irradiance CANNOT have caused the warming trend since the last 30-40 years.

  • jonman701:

    @nigelelsass So your saying that more scientists, Nobel prize winners and some of the most respected people who have all looked into this is ill-treat?
    People who were around in the past 50 years all state that nothing has really changed in the weather to amount to any difference, i would say this information isn’t valid because it has evidence its manipulated, this information could easily be ill-treat, weather change and drastic temperature has be observed to be caused by sun spots, can’t be denied!

  • 2ldr:

    @nigelelsass Thats simple enough.Just hope over to NASA’s and the ESA’s web sites.
    Believe it or not they have somewhat of a clue of whats going on.

  • nigelelsass:

    @2ldr : At the same rate than what? (GIVE your reference)

    They are NOT cooling or heating at the same rate… some are cooling, others are warming. I CHALLENGE YOU to find that they are changing temperature at the same rate…

    Voodoo science? Well it’s NOT, it’s CELESTIAL MECHANICS, mostly. I am sure you know that other planets have different orbits, differnt orbital periods, more satellites, different atmospheres, different axial tilts, etc…

    don’t leave it out, mention it !!!

  • nigelelsass:

    @2ldr : Ok I’ll be kind and give a hint for Pluto… the copy/past article in biased media states that it is warming despite increasing in distance from the Sun.
    Now reckon about… when is it the warmest on earth? when the Sun is at the Zenith or a bit shortly? I am sure you can figure out this one yourself!

  • nigelelsass:

    @2ldr : Abraham Lincoln founded National Academy of Science of the United States (peer reviewed-by), a new publication which is well research.

    PS: It would take too long to clarify you other planets heating/cooling(some are cooling) – and you would anyway not want to listen to – and if I were to tell you why some planets with less solar input are proportionally warmer you wouldn’t like the parameter (greenhouse gases) either… this is a fact you want to leave out…

  • 2ldr:

    that is my question here.
    How do we explaine the other planets heating/cooling at the exact same rate?
    or is that something we would just rather leave out of the equasion?
    looks like voodoo science to me.

  • 2ldr:

    @nigelelsass Where did you find these numbers?
    Dont tell me some orginzation tied to the UN.We already know they are full of bs.
    And if by any chance your numbers are right then we must also take the responsability of all the other planets heating up at the exact same rate.
    See you cant just leave that simple fact out .The other planets are heating up at the exact same rate.How do you explaine this ?

  • nigelelsass:

    @jonman701 : It does not get ANY CLEARER than a satellite observed changed in infra-red at different wavelength corresponding to: CO2, CH4, CFC11 and CFC12.
    On the top of that, the stratosphere is cooling as a upshot of more heat reflected at decrease atmospheric layers.

    Everything has the signature of a CO2 induced warming… no explanation which does not take inton account these facts is valid.

  • nigelelsass:

    @2ldr : 97% of all climate researchers (over 1,000) with 20 or more reviewed papers agree global warming is real and man-made (PNAS)… how could the consensus be stronger?

    You are from the people who read a copy/paste article on the warming on Mars and by no means bothered to read subsequent articles clarify it, aren’t you? Maybe it is useful to look at ALL scientific literature on the topic.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.